Wednesday, November 25, 2009
IS OBAMA EVIL?
Don't miss this video! A New York pastor claims Barack Obama is pure evil, not an American citizen, and therefore has no right to run the country. A pastor in one Harlem church has been sending out political messages that have been causing much controversy in the US. Former prisoner-turned-pastor James David Manning, who also has his own radio show, is not a fan of the US President.

The Holy Rush
Peter Sacks from the Huffington Post obviously did not read my post entitled Climategate! ;-0
http://dittosrush.blogspot.com/2009/11/climategate.html
Last night he snuck this in over at the Huffington Post:
Several months ago a guy named Andrew Klavan wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times challenging liberals to listen to Rush Limbaugh.
Because this Klavan dude concluded that I -- and people like me -- refused to listen to Limbaugh, then I was "a lowdown, yellow-bellied, lily-livered intellectual coward."
Klavan went on, "You're terrified of finding out he makes more sense than you do."
Bullshit. I'm not afraid of Limbaugh in any way, shape, or form.
But I'm terrified, all right.....
Well, Klavan, I listened to Limbaugh's most recent rant about the global warming "hoax," and this is what Rush said, word for word:
"Now, the bottom line is, the whole man-made global warming movement is a fraud. It is a hoax. It's (sic) made-up lies. I have known this since the beginning of the movement. I'm the one who said that militant environmentalism is the home of displaced communists after the Berlin Wall came down. Now, scientists cannot rely on common sense. So the anti-global warmers have to go out there and get their own science to counter the science that the pro-global warming crowd is using, and they're making it up. I instinctively know this for two reasons. One -- and I've explained in great detail before so I'm not going to do it again because of time constraints -- is I believe in God."
If any readers can make sense of this illogical, grammatically-challenged rant, I would like to know.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-sacks/the-holy-rush_b_369980.html
In other words, Mr. Sacks is desperately trying to tear Rush down apparently in order to appeal to his dwindling readership. How about looking at the evidence of Rush's arguement from the sources he provided at length during his show yesterday? There's an idea. No, instead we get the usual leftist dribble:
"Because God created humans it's impossible that humans would ever "destroy the planet," says the bald, fat man."
"I'll buy that -- and so will the six million Jews whom the Nazis rounded up on cattle cars, shipped to concentration camps, robbed of their watches, rings and money, then murdered in Nazi gas chambers."
http://dittosrush.blogspot.com/2009/11/climategate.html
Last night he snuck this in over at the Huffington Post:
Several months ago a guy named Andrew Klavan wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times challenging liberals to listen to Rush Limbaugh.
Because this Klavan dude concluded that I -- and people like me -- refused to listen to Limbaugh, then I was "a lowdown, yellow-bellied, lily-livered intellectual coward."
Klavan went on, "You're terrified of finding out he makes more sense than you do."
Bullshit. I'm not afraid of Limbaugh in any way, shape, or form.
But I'm terrified, all right.....
Well, Klavan, I listened to Limbaugh's most recent rant about the global warming "hoax," and this is what Rush said, word for word:
"Now, the bottom line is, the whole man-made global warming movement is a fraud. It is a hoax. It's (sic) made-up lies. I have known this since the beginning of the movement. I'm the one who said that militant environmentalism is the home of displaced communists after the Berlin Wall came down. Now, scientists cannot rely on common sense. So the anti-global warmers have to go out there and get their own science to counter the science that the pro-global warming crowd is using, and they're making it up. I instinctively know this for two reasons. One -- and I've explained in great detail before so I'm not going to do it again because of time constraints -- is I believe in God."
If any readers can make sense of this illogical, grammatically-challenged rant, I would like to know.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-sacks/the-holy-rush_b_369980.html
In other words, Mr. Sacks is desperately trying to tear Rush down apparently in order to appeal to his dwindling readership. How about looking at the evidence of Rush's arguement from the sources he provided at length during his show yesterday? There's an idea. No, instead we get the usual leftist dribble:
"Because God created humans it's impossible that humans would ever "destroy the planet," says the bald, fat man."
"I'll buy that -- and so will the six million Jews whom the Nazis rounded up on cattle cars, shipped to concentration camps, robbed of their watches, rings and money, then murdered in Nazi gas chambers."
Mr. Sack's Rush's argument is based on people destroying the planet, not people destroying people. Ya think there's a difference?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)